As you may remember, the raid stirred lots of controversy after the school's security videotapes were released, showing police officers pointing loaded guns at terrified students. No drugs or weapons were found in the raid, and most of the students involved were black (despite the fact that the majority of students at Stratford are white).But lawyers on both sides caution the deal is far from done.
“Ultimately, the whole thing could fall apart,” said Gregg Meyers, a lawyer for the students. “This is a work in progress.”
Following the Nov. 5, 2003, drug search, 59 students and their families sued the Goose Creek Police Department and Berkeley County School District, claiming the sweep violated their constitutional rights. U.S. District Judge Michael Duffy combined three lawsuits last year and appointed a mediator. Previous settlement negotiations have broken down. The most recent talks started in August.
Many of us were left wondering if the Goose Creek Police Department had actually found the only drug-free school in America.
But seriously, how do you determine the amount of money these students should be awarded to compensate for the terror they suffered as a result of official incompetence? Ultimately, the value of the impending court victory will be measured not in dollars, but in terms of the message it sends to drug warriors all around the country:
Lawyers for the students feel their work has assured a similar drug sweep does not occur in the future.
1 comment:
JT,
Thanks for your input, but I think you missed the sarcasm is Tom's statement.
Of course we know that "drug free schools" don't exist, and as you rightly point out, even Tylenol is a drug. It is truly surprising that no illegal drugs were found in the Goose Creek raid, and it's pretty apparent that Tom's comment was a tongue-in-cheek joke meant at exposing the ridiculousness of the "drug-free school" concept.
IMO, the best way to clean up the "pollution that the Drug War has done [to] our language" is not to avoid it, but to pick it up and recycle it. We need to use and re-use DrugWar rhetoric in our own contexts until we turn it into something useable.
In this case, Tom used humor to show that "drug-free" has become a laughable phrase. Without humor, activists become zealots.
Post a Comment