Tuesday, January 08, 2008

Extreme Ecstasy Brah!

Just when you think the ONDCP couldn't backtrack anymore, John Walters warns us of the dangers of "extreme ecstasy".

Why would anyone try to label ecstasy as extreme in the hopes that it would scare young people away from using it? Has the ONDCP ever seen the X-Games or what about Extreme Doritos? The word extreme has been used over the past decade as a youth advertisement tool for everything from snack foods to video games and has been successful. Anyone can guess what calling ecstasy "extreme" might lead to.

By calling the ecstasy extreme it seems like the ONDCP are saying the effects are more extreme or intense. As if this is some sort of new drug "cocktail" that will attract young people because its effects are stronger. This article states the obvious in saying that the "biggest reason [for mixing meth and MDMA] is cost." No other reasons are even listed because there really aren't any.

So this extreme ecstasy is actually MDMA mixed with methamphetamine and apparently is all Canada's fault. I think its important to point out that MDMA stands for 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine. See that whole part, after dioxy, that says methamphetamine. Okay, good. MDMA provides a stimulant effect. So why mix methamphetamine with MDMA pills? Because it cuts down on cost and increases profit for dealers and still gives the user that stimulant effect they expect from MDMA. Many pills have been passed off as ecstasy and when tested have been found to contain only methamphetamine or even just caffeine.

Is it really "extreme ecstasy" or is just an blatant example of ecstasy prohibition failing miserably by taking a drug that should be a pharmaceutical and placing it in the black market? As American parents and doctors pump amphetamine in the form of Adderal to children in the treatment of over-diagnosed ADD and ADHD one really has to be bewildered at this new scare tactic against ecstasy and methamphetamine.

So now American drug warriors can claim that they not only made a difference in the availability of ecstasy, or pure ecstasy rather, but they have created a new, more "extreme" drug that is more profitable for drug dealers.


Houston Mortgage Broker said...

Nice blog and good to see you keeping it real. Really great site for anybody looking for extraGet first hand information from a successful professional that has passed multiple drug tests for both career related testing and the legal system. He has recently completed a year long probation random UA program with 100% success and is now publishing his GUARANTEED METHOD on how to pass drug testing! He was successful because he educated himself on the truths about testing and researched the facts from reliable sources and knows one little secret that can’t even be found on the internet! www.urinetesting101.com

JT Barrie said...

Isn't anyone capable of "connecting the dots"? IF we presume that the government is NOT outright lying to us the logical assumption is that decades of drug prohibition leads to stronger street drugs that leads to greater prohibition that leads to stronger street drugs.... Does anyone see a logical end to this sequence? The stated goal may be "zero tolerance" for drugs but real result is an "extreme" tolerance for the results of prohibition: stronger drugs being on the street.

Edintally said...

I think it would be wrong to assume that the goal of the Drug War is the eradication of illegal drug use. So labeling an illegal drug "extreme" would not be short sighted or misinformed, but a perpetuation of the status quo.

worldpeace said...

Great site here. We should fight for drugs.